Hello Kitty Lawsuit TrackerUnofficial Sanrio Legal Archive
Case fileReal

CPSC & McDonald's — Hello Kitty whistle recall

Internal whistle parts could detach and be inhaled. McDonald’s ran the recall as distributor of the Hello Kitty toy.

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Plaintiff,
v.
McDonald's (distributor); Hello Kitty licensed product,
Defendant.
Docket No.CPSC recall (10 Nov 2014)
CourtU.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (with Health Canada)
Filed2014
StatusClosed

The record

Court
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (with Health Canada)
Jurisdiction
United States / Canada
Docket No.
CPSC recall (10 Nov 2014)
Filed
2014
Resolved
2014
Sanrio’s role
Subject
Type
Product recall
Claims
Choking / aspiration hazard (whistle components)
Counsel — plaintiff/petitioner
not public
Counsel — Sanrio side
not public

What happened

Internal whistle parts could detach and be inhaled. McDonald’s ran the recall as distributor of the Hello Kitty toy.

Outcome

About 2.3 million US units (plus ~200,000 in Canada) of a Hello Kitty 40th-anniversary Happy Meal whistle recalled. Two incidents reported; free replacement offered.

The legal nuance

Shows licensing reach: a Sanrio character on a fast-food toy pulls in CPSC oversight via the distributor.

Back to the archive