SANRIO STOCK INDEX · SSI
8136¥1,181▼ 0.88%2618NT$42.35▲ 0.36%MNSO$9.13▼ 1.72%MAT$15.04▲ 18.80%BBW$25.41▲ 1.36%MCD$231.83▲ 0.39%CROX$119.24▲ 1.65%1929HK$10.83▼ 1.19%0116HK$12.84▲ 0.71%7230RM1.73▼ 0.00%TPR$119.24▲ 3.65%
Hello Kitty Lawsuit TrackerUnofficial Sanrio Legal Archive
Case fileDomain (UDRP)

Sanrio Company Ltd. v. Song Chen and Chowbus Chowbus

A Los Angeles karaoke business used Hello Kitty’s design mark in its domains and branding. A recent (2025) win showing Sanrio is still actively recovering domains.

Sanrio Company Ltd. (represented by Gamma Law),
Plaintiff,
v.
Song Chen and Chowbus Chowbus,
Defendant.
Docket No.WIPO Case No. D2025-2292
CourtWIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
Filed2025
StatusDecided

The record

Court
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
Jurisdiction
UDRP
Docket No.
WIPO Case No. D2025-2292
Filed
2025
Resolved
2025
Sanrio’s role
Plaintiff
Type
Domain (UDRP)
Claims
UDRP — confusingly similar; no rights/legitimate interests; bad faith
Counsel — plaintiff/petitioner
Gamma Law (USA)
Counsel — Sanrio side
not public

What happened

A Los Angeles karaoke business used Hello Kitty’s design mark in its domains and branding. A recent (2025) win showing Sanrio is still actively recovering domains.

Outcome

Both <hellokittyktv.com> and <hellokittyktvla.com> transferred to Sanrio. The panel rejected the respondents’ license defense.

The legal nuance

The license defense failed: claiming a license is not the same as proving one.

Sources of record

Back to the archive