SANRIO STOCK INDEX · SSI
8136¥1,083 2.65%2618NT$43.85 0.11%MNSO$11.72 3.78%MAT$13.34 2.91%BBW$31.50 3.08%MCD$280.63 4.16%CROX$125.28 0.89%1929HK$11.57 4.61%0116HK$10.29 4.36%7230RM1.78 1.14%TPR$144.21 0.15%
Hello Kitty Lawsuit TrackerUnofficial Sanrio Legal Archive
Case fileReal

Sanrio Co., Ltd. v. Putian Maomao Silversmith Jewelry Co., Ltd.

Sanrio won an invalidation at China’s trademark board against a jewelry maker’s cat-figure mark, on the strength of its prior copyright in Hello Kitty.

Sanrio Co., Ltd. (petitioner),
Plaintiff,
v.
Putian Maomao Silversmith Jewelry Co., Ltd. (registrant),
Defendant.
Docket No.商评字[2020]第0000216086号
CourtChina Trademark Review & Adjudication Board (TRAB)
StatusDecided

The record

Court
China Trademark Review & Adjudication Board (TRAB)
Jurisdiction
China
Docket No.
商评字[2020]第0000216086号
Resolved
2020
Sanrio’s role
Petitioner
Type
Trademark
Claims
Prior copyright and reputation of the Hello Kitty figure (2013 Trademark Law Arts. 30, 32)
Counsel — plaintiff/petitioner
not public
Counsel — Sanrio side
not public

What happened

Sanrio won an invalidation at China’s trademark board against a jewelry maker’s cat-figure mark, on the strength of its prior copyright in Hello Kitty.

Outcome

The disputed mark No. 12177491 (“MM猫猫银匠及图”) was declared invalid on 18 Aug 2020; Sanrio’s copyright and similarity arguments were upheld.

The legal nuance

Copyright in the character, not just the trademark, does the work here, a common Chinese strategy against look-alike figures.

Back to the archive