SANRIO STOCK INDEX · SSI
8136¥1,220 1.29%2618NT$41.20 2.02%MNSO$8.79 3.09%MAT$13.42 4.35%BBW$25.74 5.23%MCD$252.78 1.83%CROX$111.48 0.01%1929HK$11.10 3.73%0116HK$12.76 1.24%7230RM1.75 2.23%TPR$117.11 0.68%
Hello Kitty Lawsuit TrackerUnofficial Sanrio Legal Archive
Case fileTrademark

Sanrio Co., Ltd. v. Putian Maomao Silversmith Jewelry Co., Ltd.

Sanrio won an invalidation at China’s trademark board against a jewelry maker’s cat-figure mark, on the strength of its prior copyright in Hello Kitty.

Sanrio Co., Ltd. (petitioner),
Plaintiff,
v.
Putian Maomao Silversmith Jewelry Co., Ltd. (registrant),
Defendant.
Docket No.商评字[2020]第0000216086号
CourtChina Trademark Review & Adjudication Board (TRAB)
StatusDecided

The record

Court
China Trademark Review & Adjudication Board (TRAB)
Jurisdiction
China
Docket No.
商评字[2020]第0000216086号
Resolved
2020
Sanrio’s role
Petitioner
Type
Trademark
Claims
Prior copyright and reputation of the Hello Kitty figure (2013 Trademark Law Arts. 30, 32)
Counsel — plaintiff/petitioner
not public
Counsel — Sanrio side
not public

What happened

Sanrio won an invalidation at China’s trademark board against a jewelry maker’s cat-figure mark, on the strength of its prior copyright in Hello Kitty.

Outcome

The disputed mark No. 12177491 (“MM猫猫银匠及图”) was declared invalid on 18 Aug 2020; Sanrio’s copyright and similarity arguments were upheld.

The legal nuance

Copyright in the character, not just the trademark, does the work here, a common Chinese strategy against look-alike figures.

Back to the archive